The Karnataka government on December 8 announced plans to form a House committee to review and relax rules governing the initial recognition and renewal process for private aided and unaided schools, following growing concerns over procedural delays and alleged corruption.

School Education and Literacy Minister S. Madhu Bangarappa made the announcement in the Legislative Council after multiple members raised complaints about the difficulties private institutions face in securing approvals.

He assured the House that the government will act swiftly once the committee submits its recommendations.

Bangarappa said the panel would hold a detailed review of the existing norms under the current government order and propose a practical framework that supports schools while maintaining necessary regulatory oversight.

Several Council members pressed the government to ensure that private schools are not subjected to further hurdles until the committee finalises its report.

Responding to the concerns, the minister said the government would take interim steps to prevent disruptions or administrative pressure on schools during the transition period.

The decision was welcomed across party lines, with many members arguing that stringent rules and protracted renewal processes were pushing institutions to the brink.

The discussion also saw sharp questions over alleged bribery by officials involved in the recognition renewal process. Bangarappa acknowledged earlier attempts to shift the renewal system online but conceded that the initiative had not been successful.

Issuing a firm warning, he said the government would not tolerate misconduct. “If anyone is found making money out of this process, strict disciplinary action will follow. We will not allow corruption,” he stated.

Members reiterated that alleged irregularities and harassment in the department were among the primary reasons schools were demanding regulatory relief. They urged the government to expedite the formation of the committee and ensure that reforms safeguard both institutional autonomy and student interests.